ODEAT Model for design of lesson planning with ICT integration

Article Sidebar

pdf (Spanish)

Main Article Content

Hugo Gonzalo Tapia Silva
Universidad de La Serena
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-034X
Rodrigo Castillo Robledo
Universidad de La Serena
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6872-3382
Alexis Sarzosa Veliz
Liceo Bicentenario Colegio Antonio Varas
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-9930
Rodrigo López
Licenciado en Educación
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-4240

Abstract

The present study proposes a model to guide and ease the integration of ICT on the pedagogical work, where it is considering the associate difficulties at the technological integration at the scholar context. Also, there is a theorical revision of various authors, where it is using the next proposal: Grounded Technology Integration, Types of Activities and Reverse Design. These proposals allow to structure a design or class planning process, where the ODEAT Model begins. The proposed model considers the stages of: identification of the objective (O), pedagogical decision-making (D), definition of the achievement indicator (s) (E), selection or creation of a learning activity (A), and the selection of the appropriate technology (T). Finally, the possibilities and strategies for evaluating the model are discussed.

Item information
Published: Dec 31, 2020
Issue: No. 8 (2020): Revista Convergencia Educativa
Section: Artículos de Investigación
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29035/rce.8.45
Keywords: Lesson plans, Technology uses in education, Teachers, Pedagogy, ICT

Article Details

How to Cite
Tapia Silva, H. G., Castillo Robledo, R., Sarzosa Veliz, A., & López, R. (2020). ODEAT Model for design of lesson planning with ICT integration. Convergencia Educativa, 8, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.29035/rce.8.45
References

Adimark GFK -IIE. (2013). Censo de Informática Educativa 2012. Resultados principales. (Census Report ed.). Recuperado de https://paisdospuntocero.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/03-censo_de_informatica_educativa3.pdf

Arancibia Herrera, M., Cosimo Fernández, D., & Casanova Seguel, R. (2018). Percepción de los profesores sobre integración de TIC en las prácticas de enseñanza en relación a los marcos normativos para la profesión docente en Chile. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 26(98), 163-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362017002501119



Avidov Ungar, O., & Eshet Alkalay, Y. (2011). Teachers in a World of Change: Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitudes towards the Implementation of Innovative Technologies in Schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, (7), 291-303. Recuperado de

Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980903387506

CPEIP. (2008). Marco para la Buena Enseñanza. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Educación. Recuperado de https://www.cpeip.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Marco-buena-ensenanza.pdf

CPEIP. (2018). Marco para la Buena Enseñanza. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Educación. Recuperado de https://www.cpeip.cl/marco-buena-ensenanza/

Dela Rosa, J. (2016). Experiences, perceptions and attitudes on ICT integration: A case study among novice and experienced language teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 12(3), 37-57. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124823.pdf

Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., & Gerick, J. (2017). Predictors of teachers’ use of ICT in school – the relevance of school characteristics, teachers’ attitudes and teacher collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, (22), 551-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9476-y

García Marcos, C. J., & Cabero Almenara, J. (2017). El diseño instruccional inverso para un recurso educativo abierto en la Formación Profesional española: El caso de Web Apps Project. Education in the Knowledge Society, 18(2), 19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20171821932

Gvirtz, S., & Palamidessi, M. (2011). El ABC de la tarea docente: currículum y enseñanza. Capital Federal: Aique. Recuperado de http://www.unter.org.ar/imagenes/10062.pdf

Hammond, M., Reynolds, L., & Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 191-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00389.x

Harris, J. (2011). Activity Types Wiki. Recuperado de https://activitytypes.wm.edu/

Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009a). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. En C. D. Maddux, (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education (pp. 99-108). Chesapeake, VA: Society for information. Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/1778414/Instructional_planning_activity_types_as_vehicles_for_curriculum
_based_TPACK_development

Harris, J., & Hofer, M. J. (2009b). Grounded tech integration: An effective approach based on content, pedagogy, and teacher planning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(2), 22-25. Recuperado de https://scholarworks.wm.edu/articles/28/

Harris, J., Hofer, M., Blanchard, M., Grandgenett, N., Schmidt, D., Van Olphen, M., & Young, C. (2010). “Grounded” technology integration: Instructional planning using curriculum-based activity type taxonomies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 573-605. Recuperado de https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=tedfacpub

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536

Hidson, E. (2018). Challenges to Pedagogical Content Knowledge in lesson planning during curriculum transition: a multiple case study of teachers of ICT and Computing in England (Tesis doctoral). Reino Unido, Durham University. Recuperado de http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12623/

Hofer, M., & Harris, J. (2011). Tipos de actividades de aprendizaje en el área de Ciencias Sociales. Recuperado de https://docplayer.es/4546783-Tipos-de-actividades-de-aprendizaje-en-el-area-de-ciencias-sociales-1-2.html

Janssen, N., y Lazonder, A. W. (2015). Implementing Innovative Technologies Through Lesson Plans: What Kind of Support Do Teachers Prefer? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 910-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9573-5

Janssen, N., Knoef, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2019). Technological and pedagogical support for preservice teachers’ lesson planning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 115-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2019.1569554

Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers y Education, (102), 244-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003

Kolb, L. (2017). Learning First, Technology Second. Portland: International Society for Technology in Education.

Kwangsawad, T. (2016). Examining EFL Pre-service Teachers' TPACK Trough Self-report, Lesson Plans and Actual Practice. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 103-108. DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v10i2.3575.

MINEDUC, & ENLACES. (2011). Competencias y estándares TIC para la profesión docente. Santiago: MINEDUC. Recuperado de https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/handle/20.500.12365/2151

Olivares Carmona, K. M., Angulo Armenta, J., Prieto Méndez, M. E., & Torres Gastelú, C. A. (2018). EDUCATIC: Implementación de una estrategia tecnoeducativa para la formación de la competencia digital universitaria. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (53), 27-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.02

Said Mohand, A. (2013). El diseño inverso en la adquisición de una segunda lengua: su aplicación en el desarrollo de unidades temáticas. RedELE: Revista Electrónica de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, (25). Recuperado de https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dctm/redele/Material-RedEle/Revista/2013/2013_redELE_25_05Aixa_%20Said_Mohand.pdf?documentId=0901e72b8161bea2

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers y Education, 54(1), 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, (115), 106586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Conocimiento y enseñanza: Fundamentos de la nueva reforma. Profesorado: Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 9(2), 1-30. Recuperado de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/42675

Soalablai, S. (2020). Teachers’ Use of Technology in Lesson Planning and Presentation in Palau (Tesis doctoral). Walden University, Minnesota. Recuperado de https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10721&context=dissertations

Tapia Silva, H. (2017). Orientaciones para la aplicación del Modelo TPACK en la formación de profesores de ERE. REER. Revista Electrónica de Educación Religiosa, 7(1), 1-24. Recuperado de http://reer.cl/index.php/reer/article/view/54

Tapia Silva, H. (2018). Actitud hacia las TIC y hacia su integración didáctica en la formación inicial docente. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 18(3), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i3.34437

Tapia Silva, H., & Sobrino Morrás, Á. (2019). Conocimiento tecnológico didáctico y del contenido de profesores chilenos. Campus Virtuales, 8(1), 121-138. Recuperado de http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/handle/10272/16905

Vásquez Pérez, A. (2011). Plan-do-check-act en una experiencia tic en el aula: desde la idea a la evaluación. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (36), a162-a162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2011.36.398

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria: ASCD. Recuperado de http://library.uncg.edu/info/distance_education/wiggins.pdf

Downloads statistics
Download data is not yet available.
License information
Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional